Monthly Archives: May 2007

They weren’t going to play .700 baseball forever

Posted by Steve

I knew that.  They weren’t a 100+ win team.  But lately the Brewers have played well below their ability.  Every team goes through slumps, even the good ones, so we shouldn’t start panicking–yet.  The Brewers still have the best team in the Central on paper, and there are still 110 games left.

Unfortunately, their nice cushion is all but gone.  It does not appear–at least yet, anyway–that Milwaukee will run away with the division.  It just means that we’re in store for an interesting season.

A few random thoughts/observations on their current slide:

  • Tony Gwynn’s “hotness” has cooled down.  It’s time to let him be what he is: A light-hitting pinch runner, a defensive replacement and a spot starter.  I’d like to reiterate the SPOT part of spot starter.  That means only against tough righties once, maybe twice a week.  I actually think he’d do well in this role, but as is I have no choice but to loathe Tony Gwynn Jr.
  • Going hand in hand, Corey Hart needs to play more.  It was probably easy to forget how dynamic of a player he can be.  His infield hits today were pretty much routine grounders to short.  He smoked that ball to right as well.  Unlike Tony Gwynn, Hart should not be a spot starter.  He should be starting at least 3-4 days in left or right.  Oh, and if you want a different leadoff hitter Ned, this is your guy.
  • I know Kevin Mench isn’t this bad (.263/.267/.390), but we’ve been saying that for almost a year now.  At some point you have to think that he’s just may not be as good as he was in Texas.  That, and the Rangers’ Park helped his numbers quite a bit. It’s to the point where the Brewers can no longer afford to spend at-bats to get him out of his rut.  He’s taking ABs away from Hart, Gross and even Gwynn.  I think the Brewers could get something useful for a Mench-Vargas package; maybe another arm for the pen.  Then you put either Villanueva or Gallardo in the rotation and probably call up Vinny Rottino to spell Jenkins and Gross against tough lefties.  As I type I’m realizing this should have been its own post… But it’s already here, so deal with it.
  • Nobody supported calling up Ryan Braun more than me–that fact is well documented throughout the brief history of this blog.  But even I think the Brewers have asked too much of him.  Yost said they weren’t going to depend on him to carry the offense.  So why then, Ned, have you put him in the three-hole the last two games? Braun admitted he was trying to do too much on Monday; I would hope he’s batting sixth or seventh on Tuesday.  What’s wrong with Weeks-Hardy-Fielder at the top?
  • I still believe in Dave Bush.  Still.
  • Upon further review, the NL Central does in fact appear to be that bad.  The Brewers have lost 13 of their last 17 games and astonishingly still hold a five game lead.  You can look at that as a positive thing, or you can say that if they had just played .500 over that stretch they’d have about a 12-game lead.  I’ll let you decide if the glass is half empty or half full.

So anywho, things don’t get any easier in the next couple days, with the Braves sending John Smoltz and Tim Hudson to face the Crew.  It’s a long season, and they have plenty of time to right this ship.  Look on the bright side: They’re still five up, they have a long homestand, Sheets-Smoltz could be a great game, and  Dave Bush is going for 8 IP/2 runs/9 Ks on Wednesday.  Book it.

Our third baseman will no longer hit eighth!

Posted by Steve 

Well it looks like Doug Melvin has had enough of Craig Counsell and Tony Graffanino (I know I have).  The Brewers called up Ryan Braun Thursday in time for the San Diego series.  Braun will be wearing number eight and presumably start at third base on Friday.

Needless to say, this is a very exciting move.  The offense has been struggling a bit, so hopefully this will be a shot in the arm.  At this point Braun’s Super 2 status is unclear, but the Braintrust obviously felt they needed his bat in the lineup.  He brings more athleticism and speed to the position, but most importantly, a LOT more slugging.  I have celebrated this wonderful event by happily editing the rosters in my sidebar.  Man, that felt nice moving Counsell to the bench.—————>

It will be very exciting/interesting to watch one of the games best prospects in the big leagues.  Here’s to a .275/.350/.460 season or betterand an outside shot at rookie of the year.  By the way, PECOTA has Braun pegged for .283/.341/.504.  Those are some yummy numbers Cookie Monster.

braun.jpg

Photo courtesy of Brewers.com 

————————–

A few odds and ends, while I’m at it:

  • This makes me feel ill. 
  • Kevin is also doing a Brewers blog for a class project.  He has a lot of content considering the short period of time he’s been up and running, and he has some good stuff.  Check him out.
  • Speaking of awesome blogs, have a looksee at this one… It’s by none other than the Brewers’ own (Yeehaw!) Geoff Jenkins.  I think this is pretty cool; you can tell he spent a decent amount of time writing the posts.
  • Patrick from Brewerfan has his draft article up.  I’ll probably make a post just giving an overview of some candidates for the Brewers first pick, but if you want to learn about the draft you need to go to brewerfan.net.  Their coverage is excellent.

The controversy that is Tony Gwynn Jr.

Posted by Steve

As the TGJ thread at brewerfan approaches its 18th page, I have decided to bring my opinion here.  Anything at bf is pretty much lost among the mass of posts anyways.  The arguments have spiraled into the likes of stocks vs. bonds, Russell Branyan and Scott Podsednik.  It’s pretty amusing actually, and if you have an hour to kill you might want to check it out.

But anyways…

Gwynn got off to a very hot start this season, and as recently as a couple weeks ago carried a .400+ batting average.  His hot start has translated into more playing time than one would expect out of the 25th man on the roster at the start of the season.

Obviously, Gwynn’s batting average has fallen off a bit.  He’s now hitting .345.  The thing is, he’s still getting the majority of starts against right-handers over Gabe Gross and/or Corey Hart, who are both superior players.

What Gwynn is doing right now, both in batting average and on-base percentage, is something he has never done in his professional career.  Until he repeated AAA, he never really had carried a respectable OBP for someone with zero power.  He’s had 55 at-bats this season, and while it’s apparent that he has improved, it’s obvious that he isn’t as good as his small-sample numbers.

People who are in support of more playing time for Gwynn argue the following:   He has speed, great defense, stolen base ability and the potentialto post a good OBP.  Also, he’s a “prototypical lead-off hitter.”

He does have decent speed, and he does appear to be the Brewers best defensive outfielder (I was stunned when he gunned down David Wright in New York at second base).   But Hart is faster than Gwynn and has had more success in his career stealing bases than Gwynn.  Gross and Hart bothhave higher career OBPs than Gwynn.  Gwynn’s defensive edge doesn’t make up for the advantages the other two have offensively.

Corey Hart was supposed to get the majority of starts in right field this season (at least that’s what we were led to believe).  Well things changed a bit when he injured his wrist, and he has lost his power stroke for the time being.  But he started the other night against a lefty, and he appears to be healthy again.  If that is the case, his playing time needs to increase.

Many see this issue boiling down to Gross vs. Gwynn, as they are both left-handed outfielders off the bench.  Let’s compare numbers.

Gross career: .247/.352/.405

Gross 2007: .222/.379/.467

Gwynn career: .295/.333/.356

Gwynn 2007: .345/.410/.418

First of all, keep in mind that neither player has gotten many major league at-bats.  Gross has 474 ABs in four seasons while Gwynn has just 132 ABs in two seasons.  But there are some indicators in there.

First of all, Gross has a .222 batting average and a .379 OBP.  That is, in a word, insane.  At this rate, if he can even raise his batting average to .250 (not unrealistic; he hit .274 in 208 ABs for the Brewers last year) he’ll be OBPing at .400.

Second of all, Gwynn’s .410 OBP this season is being held up by his .367 average.  So what it comes down to is, if you think Gwynn will hit .360 all year and you think Gross will hit .230 all year, Gwynn is your choice.  Since neither one will happen, here’s hoping that Yost sees Gross as the more valuable option sooner rather than later.

That, and playing Corey Hart more.

Knocking on Wood

Posted by Steve 

Not to jinx anything, but Bill Schroeder said on FSN tonight that the Brewers have used a Major League-low 26 players this season.  Last year at this time the Brewers had used 49.  If you’re looking for more reasons why they are in first, health is definitely a big one.

Edit:  The Brewers used 49 players total last season.  Either I misheard the FSN guys or they said it incorrectly.  Still though, that’s a drastic difference.

J.J. Freaking Hardy

Posted by Steve

I think we’re far enough into the season where J.J. Hardy’s MVP-type performance is worth discussing.  Incidentally, the title of this post is also the name of my fantasy team at the moment (it’s named after my waiver claim shortstop who has relegated Michael Young to the bench).

PECOTA had Hardy for .263/.329/.419 with 11 home runs.  I did think this projection was a little on the low side, but it certainly wasn’t anything close to unreasonable.  Hardy was tabbed as a guy who could eventually hit 15-25 home runs, but nothing like what he is currently on pace for.  After an injury-ruined season many were just anxious to see what Hardy could do with a full season, and whether he was able to even stay healthy.

If this glimpse is anything close to what he’ll be, the Brewers already have their best shortstop since Robin Yount and a guy who will hit 30 bombs a season with good defense.  Those who were vehemently against moving Bill Hall away from short now see what all the hype was about.

One of my favorite quotes from Moneyball is this one from Billy Beane:  “Power is something that can be acquired.  Good hitters develop power.  Power hitters don’t become good hitters.”

It certainly seems that way for Hardy.  Plus, he’s just so dreamy.

jj-hardy-jsonline.jpg

Photo courtesy JSOnline

Credit where credit is due

Posted by Steve 

I made it obvious that I didn’t like the way Ned Yost handled his bullpen the other night (the Shouse-Turnbow fiasco) but I thought his moves in today’s game were perfect.

Sheets was at 102 pitches after seven innings and had a 2-1 lead.  The Brewers scored one run in the top of the eighth, giving them a two-run cushion.  Rather than sending in Turnbow, Yost gave Sheets a chance to go out and pitch through the eighth.

A couple things came into play here.  Sheets had been throwing a good game to that point; allowing one run, striking out eight and walking just one.  While he looked better Tuesday than Monday, Turnbow had still blown two straight games.  Finally, that insurance run gave the team a slight margin for error.

Yost seemed to take all these factors into account and decided to send Sheets out for the eighth.  He got the first two outs, but then gave up a run on back-to-back hits.  It was clear that Sheets needed to leave the game, but rather than going to Turnbow for the last out (in yet another pressure situation) he went to his closer to get four outs.  Cordero, who hadn’t even pitched yet on the road trip, came in, got out of the eighth, and then closed it out in the ninth.

Yost did a good job letting his starter try to shorten the game without taking too big of a risk, and he made the right call with Cordero over Turnbow in the eighth.  Just thought I’d give Ned some props after calling him out the other day.

———————–

Looking ahead to Minnesota, the Brewers luck out in pitching match-ups once again.  Santana just pitched Friday, so the Crew won’t see him.  The Twins are reeling a bit, as they have lost seven of their last eight.  Hopefully some home cookin’, a slumping team and some decent pitching match-ups will make for a series win.

A four-run lead is darn near insurmountable

Posted by Steve

I cannot stand fans who second-guess managerial moves and chastise their team every day, which is why I don’t do it very often.  I have to today, however.

Going into the eighth inning, the Brewers had a four-run lead over the Phillies.  Both Turnbow and Cordero had not pitched in four days, but Yost elected to let Brian Shouse start the inning against right-handed hitting Aaron Rowand and switch-hitting Shane Victorino.  I actually wondered aloud why Turnbow wasn’t starting the eighth once I saw Shouse in there.  I knew Shouse was bad against righties, but the splits actually show he’s astoundingly bad:  Over the last three seasons Shouse has allowed righties to hit .311/.399/.493.

Now I know Shouse only allowed two runners, and the real implosion came from the 2006-post-All-Star Break version of Derrick Turnbow, but Shouse simply had no business being in the game at that point.  If the Phillies were sending up lefties, I could see it, maybe.  But Turnbow has been lights out, and he would have made it much tougher on Rowand than Shouse.  And it’s not totally fair to speculate, but who knows if Turnbow would have been so bad if he didn’t have to come into the game in a jam right away?

Dan mentioned to me that for whatever reason, he figured that Yost would have sent out Turnbow to start the eighth if the Brewers were only up three.  I guaranteehe would have been, but because it wasn’t a “save situation,” Yost figured he could get by.

So to simplify:

  1. Brian Shouse cannot get righties out.
  2. Number 1 doesn’t matter to Ned Yost if he has a four-run lead.
  3. Derrick Turnbow has a history of pitching poorly under pressure.
  4. The Brewers blew a game they should have won.

Edit! Edit!

I had to follow up on this.  I SWEAR I wrote this post before the article was released on JSOnline.  Excerpt:

With a three-run lead, Ned Yost would not have strayed from his usual formula of Derrick Turnbow in the eighth and Francisco Cordero in the ninth.

With a four-run lead, things change, and they changed for the worse for the Milwaukee Brewers Monday night.

That, to me, is a joke.  Later in the article, Yost does admit to using splits:

“I was just going on matchups with a four-run lead,” Yost said. “Looking at (Aaron) Rowand, his numbers have about a 130-point split between left and right, and we were looking for ‘Shousie’ to throw a ground ball and maybe get a couple outs there with ‘Shousie’ and have Turnbow throw the ninth with a four-run lead.”

Rowand was hitting .381 against right-handers and just .256 against lefties, and Shane Victorino hit right-handers to the tune of .303 but left-handers just .234.

So instead of looking at the splits of his own pitcher, Yost looked at a sample of 100 at-bats or so.  Interestingly enough, if he would have looked at a sample big enough–say 2004-2007–to tell him anything, he’d have seen that Rowand hit .280 against righties and .284 against lefties.

Who says Johnny Estrada swings at everything?

Posted by Dan

It sure seems like every Johnny Estrada at bat is over before his name is even finished being announced. Watching the Brewers-Mets game today, I think he has seen about 4 pitches in 3 at bats. Looking at the league leaders for Pitches per Plate Appearance shows that I am not merely imagining this. Estrada sees an average of 2.99 P/PA. Where does that rank him? Out of players with at least 50 PA, this ranks him 311 — out of 312. The only one who swings more often is Jay Payton (2.96).

How important is this road trip, really?

Posted by Steve

I’ve heard a lot of people say that this upcoming road trip will “tell us a lot” about the Brewers. That the NL Central is weak, and the Brewers really haven’t played anyone yet. In fact, many articles have been written over the past few days, on both local and national levels, implying that the Brewers still have to prove themselves.

My reaction to that is the Brewers have already told us plenty. I get irritated when people take something away from Milwaukee because they play in a bad division. Can we even tell if the NL Central is a good or bad division yet? They’ve been playing each other for the last three weeks. This doesn’t seem to matter to people though. The AL East has been terrible so far, but you don’t see anyone taking anything away from the Red Sox.

Baseball is not a sport in which to “make a statement,” but that is exactly what so many people still need to see before admitting that a team with a 24-10 record might actually be good. The truth is, the Brewers could fall flat on their faces against NY and Philly and still make the playoffs easily. Just because this trip is in the center-of-the-universe East Coast doesn’t mean these series are any more or less important than the Brewers’ trips to Florida or Houston or Chicago. Sure it would be nice to beat the pants off the Mets and Phillies, but not because it would make a statement.

As far as the Mets series is concerned, I like the way things stack up. While starting pitching match-ups can be deceiving, Suppan vs. Sosa is a decided advantage in the Brewers favor. Same for Saturday with Sheets vs. Pelfrey and Sunday with Capuano vs. Perez. Obviously the Mets can hit a ton, so we’ll see if that makes up for their lack of quality starting pitching (this sentence is the Mets’ season in a nutshell, essentially).

This stretch will be a tough one, with 13 of the next 16 on the road. The .700 winning percentage won’t last much longer, but if they can play .500 baseball from now until the end of May I’ll be very happy.

————-

On a personal note, I finished the last assignment of my college career this afternoon. I am officially done with school. I graduate tomorrow, and while that’s not as big of a deal to me as it is to some, it sure feels great to be finished with all that freaking schoolwork. My senior project just about drove me to the point of no return. Next comes the job hunt… But I don’t have to really worry about that for at least two days.  Ova and out.

David Thomas Bush

Posted by Dan 

A thread I saw on brewerfan.net gave me the idea for this post, which is why we should not even consider giving up on Dave Bush in the rotation yet.  After posting a 4.41 ERA (4.25 as a starter) and 1.14 WHIP over 210 innings he was projected as a breakout candidate coming into the 2007 season.  Now, with an unimpressive 5.73/1.36 start over 44 innings, many are itching to move him to the pen.  I think that would be a mistake.  Looking at his peripheral stats, you can see Bush is pitching better than it appears at first glance. I’ll list them with his 2006 numbers, and his 2007 numbers second.

Strikeouts per nine innings= 7.11/6.96

Strikeouts per Walk=4.37/4.25

HR per nine innings= 1.11/1.02

As a pitcher, the things you can control are how many hitters you strikeout, how many hitters you walk, and how many home runs you allow– Everything else depends on what happens once the ball is hit.  So, what is there to attribute Bush’s disappointing start to? I believe it is simply bad luck.  As of May 1, his “Batting Average on Balls In Play (BABIP)” is .383.  This means on balls hit into play (not including HR) opposing hitters have a batting average of .383! The league average is around .300 which means more texas leaguers are falling in, more line drives are getting through and more groundballs are just out of our fielders reach than statistics say is normal.  This will even out with time and Bush’s numbers will return to where we expect them to be.