Monthly Archives: January 2008

Examining the payroll

Posted by Steve

Now that the Brewers’ main pieces are in place, we can get a rough idea of what the payroll would be if the season started tomorrow. Here is a list of players’ guaranteed salaries for 2008 (salary figures taken from rotoworld). The players in bold are the players who I believe would break camp with the 25-man roster (Again, this is if the season started now.  I don’t actually expect the Brewers to have a 13-man pitching staff on Opening Day). Note that the 2008 league minimum salary is $390K (must be a rough life, eh?).

Ben Sheets- $11 mil

Yovani Gallardo- Near minimum

Jeff Suppan- $8 mil

Chris Capuano- $3.75 mil

Dave Bush- Arbitration Pending (between $2.25 and $3 mil, I’ll go with 2.65)

Carlos Villanueva- Near minimum

Claudio Vargas- $3.6 mil

Manny Parra- Near minimum

Eric Gagne- $10 mil

David Riske- $4.3 mil

Derrick Turnbow- $3.2 mil

Salomon Torres- $3.2 mil

Guillermo Mota- $3.2 mil

Brian Shouse- $2 mil

Chris Spurling- Near minimum

Seth McClung- Near minimum

Mitch Stetter- Near minimum

Jason Kendall- $4.25 mil

Eric Munson- $525K

Mike Rivera- Near minimum

Prince Fielder- Near minimum

Rickie Weeks- Couldn’t find… Made $1.35 last year, so $2 mil should be a safe bet

J.J. Hardy- Arbitration Pending (between 2.4 and 3.05, I’ll go with $2.75)

Bill Hall- $4.8 mil

Ryan Braun- Near minimum

Mike Cameron- $6.25

Corey Hart- Near minimum

Gabe Gross- Near minimum

Joe Dillon- Near minimum

Tony Gwynn Jr.- Near minimum

Gabe Kapler- $800K

Craig Counsell- $2.8 mil

Vinny Rottino- Near minimum

————————————-

That puts the total for those on my 25-man roughly around $81-82 million, and it could end up a bit higher if some players meet contract incentives. Last season they had a $70.9 mil payroll. All indications from the club are that Mark Attanasio made a nice profit last season. The Brewers did very well with attendance, and are poised to do so again, so it makes sense that they’d allow more room in the budget for player salaries.

That said, $82 mil is probably a bit higher that what they can/will accommodate. There have been rumblings of about an $80 million “cap,” so if that’s the case they’re probably a bit over. Even if they aren’t, with the way the Brewers sit right now, they don’t have much wiggle room to make a deal at the trade deadline.

Now for some observations.

  • My decisions for the 25-man roster were not all chosen based on talent. In a few cases, salary and/or minor league options came into play. A glaring example of this is Claudio Vargas winning a spot over Manny Parra, who still has an option remaining and will make league minimum compared to Vargas’ $3.6 mil.
  • The Brewers will have one of the most expensive bullpens in the majors. This is well off the norm, as they have generally had a patchwork bullpen featuring at least a couple league-minimum pitchers. 2008 is a complete 180; the way things look right now the cheapest reliever will make $2 million. Spending big money on a bullpen is something you don’t (or at least shouldn’t) do unless you believe you have a legit chance at the playoffs.
  • There are some unattractive contracts there, as with most any team (Counsell, Mota, Vargas) but they are far outweighed by the production received from pre-arbitration players. Players like Hart, Braun, Fielder, Gallardo and Villanueva are simply indispensable to a mid-market team.
  • As you can see, something has to give with the starting pitching. The Brewers find themselves in a unique situation of having a surplus of competent starting pitching. They have eight candidates for five spots. Of those eight, only Ben Sheets, Jeff Suppan and Yovani Gallardo are guaranteed spots, so let’s take a look at the next five.
    • I think the safest bet right to make the rotation, whether right or wrong, is Capuano. He has a few things going for him: He has been more successful in the past than any of the other three; he’s making $3.75 mil (not going to pay him that to pitch in the minors) and he’s lefty in a rotation filled with righties.
    • Villanueva may have an edge as well. He pitched very well out of the bullpen in a long-relief role for the first half of the season and also in some key starts down the stretch.
    • Bush has some things going for him too. Enigma or not, he continues to tempt with strong secondary numbers. He’s no longer very cheap, and he also could be a candidate for the bullpen (he was a closer in college).
    • Parra really appears to be the odd man out, and it’s really too bad. Many teams would love to throw him in their rotation. He’s a talented pitcher and a lefty, but he has an option remaining and is inexpensive. He’s not going to get a spot over the more proven Villanueva, so odds are he starts the season in AAA.
    • Compared to the other four, the only thing Vargas has going for him is a salary fat enough to keep him out of the minor leagues.

Here’s how things sit right now. Two of those five pitchers would start in the rotation, and one would probably pitch out of the bullpen in long relief. That leaves two to either be traded or sent to the minors.

Based on that, it makes sense to just send Parra to Nashville. Couple problems with that, however: That still leaves four pitchers for three spots, the Brewers probably need to trim a few million off their payroll and Vargas at $3.6 mil doesn’t have much value to the Brewers.

That points to Vargas being traded, which is what I expect to happen. There are teams who are desperate for pitching that would probably take on his salary. The Brewers may not get much in return, likely a low-level prospect or two, but as long as they can move his salary that will be fine. That will probably put the Brewers just below $80 million.

In this scenario, the Brewers probably have a few options.

Option A: Capuano and Villanueva in the rotation; Bush in long relief.

Option B: Capuano and Bush in the rotation, Villanueva in long relief role similar to the first half of last year.

Option C: Bush and Villanueva in the rotation, Capuano in long relief.

This is honestly too tough for me to really decide. I’d like to keep Parra in a starting role, so unless two pitchers are traded he’ll be in Nashville. but I really would like to see what Villanueva could do starting all season in the big leagues. If for some reason you held a gun for the purpose of forcing an answer out of me (“MARK IT ZERO SMOKEY! YOU’RE ENTERING A WORLD OF PAIN!”) I’d probably choose A. Bush could very well be dominant in short outings and Parra can be a phone call away to fill in if/when an injury occurs.

By the way, I likely just wasted an hour and a half of my time (and a few minutes of yours) because the odds are quite good that some sort of injury will occur along the way. The nice thing is the Brewers are better equipped to deal with those injuries than most teams.

 

A quick link

Posted by Steve

Just wanted to link to a nice but simple analysis of the Cameron signing.   They have  it as a 4 to 5.5 win improvement.

There’s no turning back now

Posted by Steve

Even if the Brewers decided for some reason to change their mind and keep Ryan Braun at third, I don’t see how they could now. Not after this quote from Braun at JSOnline:

“It’s in my best interests and in the best interests of the team. Whatever makes us better, I’m all for it. There’s no question it’s the right move.

A closer look at the Mike Cameron signing

Posted by Steve

With the signing of Mike Cameron, the 2008 team is pretty much set. This acquisition is an interesting one, and one that definitely does not appear to have been Melvin’s first choice. He inquired about Scott Rolen, David DeJesus, Andre Ethier and Hank Blalock for sure, and presumably several more left-handed hitters, but apparently just couldn’t find a good deal.That left him with Mike Cameron, who is not really ideal, but is certainly better than some of the names recently linked to the Brewers, such as Luis Gonzalez, Pedro Feliz and Shawn Green.

While Cameron’s presence will improve the team, the signing is definitely not without flaws. Let’s take a look at the pros and cons, with cons first. Always ask for the bad news first, right?

Cons

  • He’s right-handed, leaving Prince Fielder as the only left-handed hitting starter.
  • He’s no spring chicken at 35.
  • He doesn’t play third. I preferred a slick-fielding third baseman so the Brewers could let Hall stay in center, a position where he improved significantly in the second half of 2007. Hall has been competent at third, but won’t be near the top defensively.
  • We’ve been hearing how the Brewers would like to improve team OBP, but Cameron’s last season was an underwhelming .328.
  • He’ll miss the first 25 games for the illegal supplement suspension.
  • He strikes out a lot. Not that strikeouts really matter, but they can be frustrating to watch, so I threw that on here.
  • If Cameron has another face-breaking collision, it will likely be with either Corey Hart or Ryan Braun.

Pros

  • This was a very low-risk deal. A one-year deal with a club option for a second is very nice. Not to mention this is a cheap signing. Only about $6.2 mil is guaranteed, which is about 3-4 mil less than what I’d have guessed. As a quick aside, I’m enjoying Doug’s new hobby of collecting short-term contracts. Kendall, Mota, Torres, Gagne and Cameron are all newcomers signed for two years or less. Nobody is going to keep a team handcuffed with short deals like those.
  • All it cost the Brewers was money–Rolen, Blalock, Ethier, Teahen, DeJesus, etc. would have all required good players in a trade.
  • Clearly the most important part of this signing and the motivation behind it: This will improve team defense by A TON. Cameron has been a great defensive center fielder. At 35 he may be slowing down, but he’s still going to be an upgrade from Hall. He also sets off a cute little chain reaction, sending Hall to third base and Braun to left field. This will also carry over to pitching, as more balls fielded=lower E.R.A.
  • Cameron’s numbers from the last couple seasons are deceiving since he played in a very spacious pitcher’s park in San Diego. He hit .242/.328/.431 last season, but his line on the road was .254/.341/.449. Furthermore, his career OBP is .341, which is not bad at all. I expect 2008 to look close to his career numbers since Miller Park is much more hitter-friendly than Petco Park.
  • When you compare Cameron to some departed players, even the .328 OBP from last year doesn’t look bad. In 420 ABs Jenkins’ OBP was .319, in 288 ABs Mench’s was .305 and in 442 ABs Estrada’s was a putrid .296. A lot of improvement will be addition by subtraction.
  • He brings better speed and baserunning.
  • Before Cameron’s signing, left field likely would have been a Gross/Dillon (or Kapler) platoon. Now with Braun, Cameron and Hart all as full-time starters, Gross can be the fourth outfielder Dillon can be the supersub. This strengthens the bench substantially.

There’s a reason I had more to say about the pros than the cons: I think it’s a good move overall. Sure he’s not lefty, and sure his OBP isn’t great, but it improved the team defense drastically, it keeps the bench solid and the Brewers still have their surplus of starting pitching to deal from at a later time. The Crew will once again have the NL Central’s best offense, as seven of their regular starters have the ability to hit 20 home runs.

I have to admit that at the end of ’07 I was pretty concerned that the Brewers would not take Braun off third base. Even though I pretty much knew by this time that they fully intended to send him to the outfield, it’s nice that it is official. It is pretty crappy that Hall gets moved again, but I’m sure he’ll live.

Before I wrap this up, there’s one thing I’d like to nip in the bud right now. Ryan Braun’s batting average on balls in play (BABIP) last season was .373. League average is around .300. Braun is a skilled player who hits the ball hard, so it makes sense that he would be above average, but .373 is just downright fluky. Couple that with his low walk rate, and Braun is due for some regression due to plain ol’ luck, probably dropping his batting average to around .300.

So what’s the point of me saying this now? Because I know people will be complaining that his move to the outfield is affecting his offense and speculating that the Brewers made a mistake. So, basically, when I claim that Braun was bound to regress a bit offensively, I can show them this post dated January 12.

But anyways.  It seems strange to claim that the signing of Mike Cameron could put a team over the top, but due to the extenuating circumstances of getting Braun off of third base I see this as the move that pushes the Brewers past the Cubs for the N.L. Central.

More to come later, but…

Posted by Steve

Ryan Braun has officially been moved to the outfield due to the Mike Cameron signing, which makes me quite happy.

Did I fall asleep for three months?

Posted by Steve

Or did we somehow skip January, February and March and jump right to opening day? It must be one or the other, otherwise why would John Donovan write an article rating teams’ off-seasons in early January?

Donovan lists the Brewers number two on his list for worst off-seasons so far. I’ll get into why I think this is totally wrong, but first I’d like to dwell some more on how stupid it is to write this column when there are still two months before spring training begins.

Sure, teams have been pretty quiet lately. There aren’t many new rumors, which, incidentally, is why I haven’t posted much lately. But it seems obvious that the Brewers are not done making moves. I believe they will still find a third baseman, but even if they don’t, it seems obvious that the Brewers will not keep all of Ben Sheets, Yovani Gallardo, Jeff Suppan, Carlos Villanueva, Dave Bush, Chris Capuano, Claudio Vargas and Manny Parra, all of whom are worthy of starting in the big leagues. Surely many teams are in similar situations, so why pass judgment when more moves are certain to be made?

You may remember my post about another John Donovan article in which he wrote his “obituaries” for 2007 playoff contenders–the same article where he declared the Brewers dead while sitting in first place and also wrote off the Phillies and Rockies. At least this latest column is not as strange/cheezy, but I can make a good case against about half of the points he makes in this article.

Take this blurb about the Brewers, for instance.

Eric Gagne signed a one-year, $10 million deal with the Brewers. This for giving up 26 hits in 18 2/3 innings with Boston last season. He had a 6.75 ERA after his trade from Texas. I’m not saying he’s as bad as he was with the Sox. I’m saying he’s not worth anywhere near this deal.

There is so much wrong with this”assessment.” He has the Gagne signing as the #1 worst risk among pitchers. How can anyone say that about a one year deal? The Gagne signing is in fact low-risk because if he bombs the Brewers aren’t stuck with him past ’08. Sure, ten mil isn’t cheap, but when that money is off the books after next season and it won’t affect a possible Sheets extension, arbitration raises for Fielder, Hardy, Weeks, Hart, etc., there’s really nothing alarming about it. They’ll also get draft picks out of it, as he’ll likely be a Type A. I’d actually say that the Riske signing was… more perilous.

Second wrong point in that paragraph: He admits that Gagne is not as bad as he showed with the Red Sox, but he still uses his numbers with Boston as his main reason against the signing. The most humorous part is that he even mentions that his stint in Boston was just 18 2/3 innings. Of course it’s assinine to pass any serious judgment off 18 2/3 innings.

Even worse is the fact that he used ERA to evaluate him. ERA for a relief pitcher is only more revealing than pointless stats like wins, losses and saves because of the small amount of innings they pitch. I’m using extreme examples for effect, but here’s why you can’t use ERA in this situation:

Example 1: A reliever could come in with two guys on and two outs, give up three straight line drive hits and have a 0.00 ERA for that outing when the pitcher who comes in to clean up his mess retires the side.

Example 2: A reliever comes in with nobody on and records two strikeouts and then allows a bloop single. He’s replaced with two outs for a lefty-lefty match-up, but the lefty surrenders a home run. Now that first reliever has an ERA of 13.50 for that outing. See how misleading that can be?

If Mr. Donovan would have done some actual research, he would have seen that Gagne’s performance in Boston was really not much different than in Texas last season. Let’s take a look at some of the more telling numbers.

IP K/9 BB/9 HR

Texas 33.1 7.83 2.42 2

Boston 18.2 10.61 2.44 1

Looks pretty similar, right? So why the difference then? Well, it was mainly luck. Gagne’s opponent batting average on balls in play (BABIP) with Boston was an astronomical .439.

So basically, even though it’s almost pointless to evaluate a pitcher over 18 innings, Donovan didn’t even do it. He just looked at his ERA. And this signing, the one-year signing, is riskier to him than 4 years/$48 mil for Carlos Silva, or 3 years/$19 mil for Scott Linebrink.

There are plenty more gems in Donovan’s piece. He contradicts himself by saying the Reds need to overpay for pitching to compete in their tiny park, then he ridicules them for paying Francisco Cordero too much.

He lists Andruw Jones’ contract (2 years/$36 million) among the riskiest, even though it’s only two years and $18 mil is nothing to the Dodgers. I actually liked the Jones signing a lot for the Dodgers.

He says the Mets need to do more to compete for the division, even though they’re returning the same team who had a huge lead in said division on September 1.

Here’s another blurb:

The Diamondbacks traded for A’s starter Dan Haren, who could give new Arizona teammate Brandon Webb a run for the Cy Young as the two go back-to-back for the next three years. Maybe by the end of the 2010 season, the A’s and a couple of the six mostly no-name players they received in this swap will be back to competing.

I love this. “Six mostly no-name players.” I’m guessing these players are “no-name” because John Donovan has never heard of any of them. Could that be because… None have reached the majors yet? Dan Haren is great, but Donovan conveniently fails to mention that the A’s acquired what Baseball America considers Arizona’s #1, 3, 7 and 8 prospects all for one person. All signs indicate Haren will dominate in Arizona, but I’d argue that the Diamondbacks are actually taking the bigger risk by giving half their farm system for one player.

There are even more disputable things in his column, but I don’t have any more time to spend on this. I need to start work on my next post: Grading the careers of Yovani Gallardo, Rickie Weeks and Ryan Braun.