Category Archives: Uncategorized

Bad to worse

Posted by Steve

While obviously not ideal, losing Chris Narveson and Mat Gamel was manageable. Losing Alex Gonzalez, who joins Gamel with a torn ACL, is a different story. Gonzalez had been impressive this season. He came up with some big hits, but more importantly, his defense was terrific. The Brewers have in-house options Gamel and Narveson, but there are no passable replacements for Gonzalez currently in the organization. If the Brewers want to contend this season, they’ll need to add a new shortstop somehow.

This should be the focus. I have no interest in adding Derek Lee to play first base. Not because he wouldn’t help; he’d fit in nicely as a platoon with Taylor Green. But who actually believes Roenicke wouldn’t play Lee most of the time? He’s a 36-year-old who had a .325 OBP last year; Lee won’t help as a near full-time player.

So, much like we did a few months ago, let’s look at some shortstop options.

Unfortunately, there aren’t many. It’s too early for teams to give up on the season, therefore you won’t find many sellers. Two who are so bad that they shouldn’t have qualms would be the Twins and Padres.

Jamey Carroll was just benched. The Twins gave him a two year deal for $6 million. He’s 38 and can’t play every day. I’m not all that interested in Carroll, but he wouldn’t cost much of anything in terms of prospects.

The Padres have Jason Bartlett signed for $5.5 million this year. Bartlett doesn’t do much for me, either. He hasn’t reached a WAR of 2 since 2009, and Fangraphs doesn’t think much of his defense.

Gonzalez already had a .4 WAR this season (Yuni had 0.5 all of last season!) The Brewers aren’t going to find someone to play at that level, although Gonzalez wasn’t going to keep that up either. Bartlett and Carroll just aren’t worth the money; they aren’t that much better than replacement level at this point.

The Brewers do need a new shortstop, but the reality is they will likely need to wait until sometime in June to get one. That means it’s up to play well enough in the meantime, so the team is still in position to buy once others are willing to sell.

I’m not all that worried yet, to be honest. Rickie Weeks, Aramis Ramirez, and Ryan Braun (save for one game, really) have yet to hit their stride offensively. Yo is going to turn it around. They should be able to hang around .500 and be in position to add a shortstop within the next 4-6 weeks.

This was inevitable, but that doesn’t make it any less dumb

Posted by Steve

You just knew something like this was coming. It’s been some time since I got to FJM an article, so I’ll gladly welcome this chance.

An uneasy feeling about Braun

Published March 19, 2012 at 11:00 a.m.

Listening to the radio and reading various reports on the goings-on in Milwaukee Brewers camp in Maryvale, Ariz. over the last few weeks have worked up a feeling I didn’t think I’d have again for quite some time.

Excitement for baseball’s return?

It’s not a knot in the stomach, exactly, but sort of that uneasy squirminess that comes a few hours after you took a chance on that milk in your fridge when the expiration date had passed.

Uh…

I mean, it was only a couple days and it smelled okay, so what the heck right? And I’ll only put a little in the cereal.

But once your stomach rumbles as you get jammed up on 94 due to some construction, you don’t think positively – your brain immediately turns to all the worst case outcomes possible.

This is kind of gross, and probably officially a long-winded introduction. Almost Matthew Berry-esque.

I get that feeling hearing about Ryan Braun’s struggles this spring, about the 1-for-15 he carries into this week’s games.

Oh Lord. 1-for-15. 1-for-15!? Let’s pretend for just a second that Spring Training stats mean absolutely anything at all. It’s difficult, but just try.

A 1-for-15 stretch is almost nothing. Players have stretches like that all the time. Let’s imagine that during the course of the season, a player had stretches of 2-for-12, 3-for-18, 1-for-15, 3-for-34(!), 3-for-19, 1-for-10, 1-for-15, 1-for-12, and 1-for-13.

Looks pretty ugly, right?

Those stretches are from a player in 2011. That player is Ryan Braun, and he won the MVP last season. Yet, we’re about to suffer through a column because Braun has gone 1-for-15 in Spring Training.

The MVP will play in back-to-back games for the first time beginning today, and maintains the spring is about the “process” rather than results – always has, always will. He says his lack of success, as well as the boo’s he’s received, don’t concern him.

It’s all part of the process.

For the better part of my life, I’ve believed that and paid no mind to spring training results.

So why on Earth would you start now?

I’ve been to multiple training camps and seen hitters spend days either trying to pull or push every pitch in every at-bat, regardless of outcome. It’s what the spring is for, to work on those things. So yes, to an extent, March is about development.

If by “extent” you mean “the entire reason for,” you’re correct.

But the reason I feel a little anxious about Braun’s issues is because I’ve also seen firsthand the painful and inexplicable decimation of a baseball player, physically and mentally, due to increased pressure and negative scrutiny.

I’ve seen it twice, actually.

Not TWICE!?!?@#@!

The most baffling example came just last year in Chicago, when the White Sox signed Adam Dunn to as one of a series of offseason moves to tell fans the team was “all in” in its effort to win another World Series.

It was a wise move. Dunn’s 10-year average of 35.4 home runs, 88 RBI and .899 OPS put him in the same statistical stratosphere as Hall of Famers Reggie Jackson, Harmon Killebrew and Ralph Kiner, as well as future Hall of Famer Jim Thome.

For the first time in his career, however, there were heavy personal and team expectations placed upon him. In the first four games of the season, Dunn produced, going 4-for-14 (.286) with a homer, five RBI, four walks and three runs scored. Then he underwent an emergency appendectomy, missed a week, and then re-started a year that will go down as one of the worst offensive seasons in modern baseball history.

Not only did he hit just .154 with 11 homers , but his OPS was 300 percentage points lower than his career average. It was mind-boggling.

Dunn is a strange case for sure, but he’s a few years older than Braun and has a very different type of game. Also, I was understating things when I said Dunn was a strange case. His is perhaps the most bizarre/immediate falloff in the last 30 or so years of baseball. Trying to assume that Braun might fall off because Dunn did in such a radical fashion makes no sense.

A similar situation happened to the Chicago Cubs in 2009 after back-to-back playoff seasons resulted in first round exits.

The Cubs brought in Milton Bradley, who was coming off a season in which he led the league with a .436 OBP and a ridiculous .999 OPS. He was also fresh off a two-year stretch where he hit .316, had over a .940 OPS and totaled 78 extra base hits.

True, he was miscast as a left-handed slugger when the Cubs signed him, but no one could have expected a.257 average with 12 homers and a .775 OPS – his lowest output since 2002, before melting down completely and being suspended by the team.

Milton Bradley has always carried the stigma of a good player who’s emotionally volatile. He’s pretty much the Ron Artest of Major League Baseball. Again, I see no reason this could correlate to Ryan Braun at all.

These were two cases where the intense scrutiny both by the home, road and national media just wore them out. They changed what they did at the plate in trying to find a fix and they snapped on fans and reporters. Even teammates became weary of the constant questions about their performance.

Again, two. How many dozens of cases have their been in which players came in with “intense scrutiny” and still maintained a high performance?

If Braun carries these spring struggles into the season, this will only be magnified.

He’s the reigning MVP. He’s the only player to win an appeal of a positive drug test. The commissioner of baseball used to own the team. It’s going to be a three-ring circus if he doesn’t start the season on fire, and the tent will only get bigger the longer he struggles.

Ok, I can find one example that proves my point, so I am going to state it has significance to Braun. I can play this game, too!

Barry Bonds faced that scrutiny/heckling for years and still dominated. Therefore, Ryan Braun will too.

When he slumps – like all baseball players do – he needs it to happen post-All Star break when no one will really notice, or can tie it to this offseason.

The frustrating thing is he seems to have common sense. He admits that Spring Training stats don’t mean anything, and that all players slump–so again, why this column?

The first and easiest reason, on the surface, to dismiss this concern and this comparison to Dunn and Bradley is that Braun is a .312 career hitter with a .933 career OPS who has averaged 32.2 homers and 106.2 RBI in five years. He is clearly a better hitter than either Chicago player could ever be.

I love when columnists provide excellent evidence against the very point they are making.

Yet, he’s never experienced what he’s going to go through 2012, just as Dunn and Bradley never had.

Also, Braun doesn’t have Prince Fielder protecting him in the lineup. This year was going to be different, and more difficult, in that regard anyway. Mix in the increased media attention. Toss in the pressure he’ll put on himself to start fast, to show he didn’t need Fielder or performance enhancing drugs to do what he’s done.

There have been all sorts of studies that show protection does not exist. So many that I don’t even want to take the time to link to them. Google “does protection in baseball exist?” and you’ll find plenty of info.

And don’t forget Braun has gone from baseball hero, loved and respected by everyone, to a tainted player who will be booed every road trip.

And he’ll be the only player to be booed?

Barry Bonds thrived on that because he loved being a villain.

Hey, I just said that!

Sammy Sosa crumbled under similar circumstances.

I’m loving the “it happened once, so…” argument that keeps showing up.

We’ll learn a lot about Braun’s mental makeup very early in the year, and he may well go on to hit 30-plus homers and drive in 90 runs. His track record says he will.

It sure does.

But I’m going to check the date on the milk, because I’ve got that feeling all over again.

Ew.

I’m not sure how serious this is, is sometimes things like this are written to create a stir and create page views. I am reluctantly giving it more attention that it should get due to talking about it here (obviously, a nominal amount, but still–it’s the principle). Still, I enjoy these types of posts, and I miss FJM dearly, so why not.

This probably won’t go away for a while

Posted by Steve

Dino the collector made his statement today. I see a few glaring parts that do not make sense to me.

He says he finished his collections at 5 p.m. on Saturday, October 1st (I believe I said Friday in a post comment, so my mistake). This was the day of Game 1 of the NLDS against Arizona (Hey, I just realized I was present during perhaps the most infamous urine sample collection in MLB history!). He says due to the lateness (5 p.m.??), he was unable to get the sample to a FedEx that would ship that day. Problem: Braun spent a good amount of time during his Friday press conference listing all the FedEx locations that were open until 9 p.m., and one that was open 24 hours. Also, the report is that the sample was turned in to FedEx at 1:30 or so in the afternoon on Monday. Why so late in the day?

More glaring, in my mind, is this piece of info. We finally know where he actually kept the sample, as reports had it anywhere from his dresser to his refrigerator to a cooler. It was none of those; he apparently kept the urine sample in a Rubbermaid container in his basement. He said, “My basement office is sufficiently cool to store urine samples.”

Um. What? Not that I know the first thing about how cool urine samples need to be kept, but how can he prove that his basement office “is cool enough to sufficiently store urine samples”? He can’t prove what temperature it was on October 1st and 2nd.

And finally, the guy’s son was indeed a chaperone, meaning they both knew the sample belonged to Ryan Braun. Did they tell anybody during that 44 hour period?

This thing is turning into a mess. Both sides are lawyering up, but I don’t see how any side will be able to prove something either way. Unless Shyam Das’ report is released/leaked, I don’t think we’ll ever have a verdict about which people feel confident.

Andy D. made a comment on a previous post, but it was so well said that I want to share part of it again here.

As a Brewers fan, we’ve got to separate the heart from the mind on this one. I think this whole thing basically boils down to “we don’t know”. There is no way to definitively claim Braun’s innocence or guilt with what is publicly known. The article that you site here says one thing, while a new article in the JS uses an expert to say that the testosterone levels could not have gotten that high over that amount of time through degradation. So those are conflicting reports. The same goes for the courier. I have heard that he is a Cubs fan, but also that he is a well-respected trainer, and pillar of his community. I don’t know what to believe anymore. There seems to be a spin on everything.

Who knows if the guy’s even a Cubs fan? Who knows if he’s really a “good guy,” and really, what does that mean anyway? Does any of that even matter? He’s right in that there’s so much spin and doublespeak that it’s hard to get much out of these official statements.

Ugh, this is getting old, and it hasn’t even been a week yet.

Another tidbit

Posted by Steve

I realize I’m probably posting too much here, but I thought this tidbit was too good to just add in as an edit to the last post. This is a report of what Dan Patrick said this morning on his radio show.

“According to Dan Patrick, the collector bypassed 2 open Fed Ex and then went to a 3rd and it was closed. So he went back and stored it. He is a Cubs fan, and during the appeal proccess they asked him to state his name, and it took 37 seconds for him to respond. They asked him to identify Braun, and couldn’t look at him. Braun also passed a lie-dector test.”

Whaaa? This is just getting better and better! If this crap is true, there should be absolutely no doubt anymore. And if it’s true, I can see why Braun would be getting ready to sue the bejesus out of this guy and anyone else he could.

Braun Press Conference

Posted by Steve

I wanted to wait until we heard from Braun before I passed total judgment. First, some other things that came out today:

-Apparently Lester Munson, ESPN’s legal analyst, said

Live Blog of the Conference: My reactions as it’s happening

-Initial Braun claims:

-Literally never gained a pound
-Didn’t get stronger or faster, has documentation
-Making all the claims we have: 9 years left on his contract, never failed a test, no performance indications, so much to lose, not much to gain

-”If I had done this intentionally or unintentionally, I would come right out and say it.” The unintentional part is what stands out. This has nothing to do with intent. In fact, if his argument was that he took it on accident, he’d have no case.

-Wow. He went into EXTREME detail about the day of the test and the process, including a near-comical description of FedEx. He really put the collector to task, naming all the stores in the area that were open until 9 p.m. and one that was open 24 hours. That’s what this has come to.

-Apparently the collector’s son is the third party involved here, as he was actually the one who observed Braun take the test.

-Awesome comment from Braun when asked about tampering. “I know what it’s like to be falsely accused of something, so I don’t want to falsely accuse someone else.” ZING.

-Not a timid press conference at all. He seems like he’s struggling to stay calm; you can tell he’s wanted to say this for a long time.

-Even discussing the detailed process once the sample gets to the Montreal lab

-He is considering legal options! Love it.

-He actually said he never has had an STD! On national television! Wow.

-”Sad and disappointing” that this has become a PR battle for MLB.

-The second questions is a fluff question: “How important is the support of your fans?” MOVING ON

-Can’t name the collector at this time because of his possible lawsuit

-Biggest challenge he’s ever faced in his life

-Baseball-wise, he’s very motivated by this. Sounds like he’s a good bet for another great season.

-Another fluff question: “What does it mean to have your teammates behind you?” How’s he supposed to answer that, other than with a fluff answer?

-He wouldn’t speak for the entire program (whether it’s flawed), only for his case, in which case he said it was (obviously) fatally flawed.

-”The players agreed to this system. MLB has agreed to this system. The system decided I was innocent.” All very valid points. MLB is honestly abandoning its own system by disputing its outcome.

Those were mostly the highlights, but that doesn’t capture the conference. It was the way he spoke. He was determined, and it looked like he was struggling to keep from losing his temper–the opposite of someone who is trying to hide guilt. You could tell he’s been waiting five months to say all this. He was composed, and went into great detail about the process, the day of the test, and what happened in the few days afterwards.

After taking a few minutes to gauge reaction from media/twitter, it seems Braun did quite well. Even curmudgeony Bob Costas was impressed with the conference on MLB Network. He believes there is true reasonable doubt. I’m actually surprised to hear that.

On twitter, there are a lot of, “Braun hit that one out like a hanging curve” types of comments. My thought is that it only would have been better if there was a door for him to kick down as he walked off the podium.

I’m feeling jacked, and I’m taking it as an omen that my Baseball Prospectus Manual and Baseball America Manual arrived during this post. Bring on baseball.

Time to pile on MLB

Posted by Steve

It’s only been a few hours since the news of Braun’s exoneration broke, and you can already find opinions all over the board. MLB’s representatives came out and immediately shredded the tie-breaking arbitrator, Shyam Das, claiming that Braun was found innocent on a technicality. In turn, several articles either disputing the “technicality” claim, criticizing MLB’s process, or both (like here, here, and here, for example).

Because there’s already so much out there on that, I don’t see the point in repeating it, other than to say if the process is flawed, the sample is therefore flawed. Instead, I want to make a point that I haven’t seen made much tonight for whatever reason: We have still heard nothing from Ryan Braun.

Right? Isn’t that sort of crucial? In about four hours, we’ve gone from celebrating Braun’s innocence to relating his exoneration to O.J.’s (actually saw that on twitter). Remember five freaking months ago, when this first (illegally) came out? How Braun’s only reaction was to call the results “B.S.” and say he was totally innocent? I find it pretty hard to believe he’d be talking so confidently if his only line of defense was that the sample had sat out a couple days. There still has to be some bizarre details to this story that we have not heard. Why else would it have taken so damn long to resolve it?

Adding to the fishiness of this is the fact that the report that the ruling was based not on the test results (huh? how?) and instead just on the storing process of the sample. I say it’s fishy, because it comes from ESPN’s Mark Fainaru-Wada. Of course, Fainaru-Wada is the guy who broke the Braun story five months ago in the first place…. So is he the most credible in this situation? Who’s to say he’s not just trying to defend his own original report? And how could the ruling not be based on the test results, when the handling process could have tainted the results?

I just want to hear what Braun has to say tomorrow. The only twist is that, now, I’m not really sure how much he’ll actually give us. If he would have been suspended, I imagine he’d have given us full detail into his defense in attempt to save some face. Now that he’s off the hook, he might not see that need. I truly hope he does though, because otherwise the naysayers will be that much louder. Plus, selfishly, I’m really curious to know what extenuating circumstances dragged this out so long.

As for MLB…. They’re coming off like morons. This debacle is entirely their fault, yet they’re trying to place the blame all on one person (Das). Let’s go over MLB’s errors, from start to finish:

-Letting the positive test get leaked to ESPN in the first place. It’s crazy to think that all of this, including today’s hoopla, should not be known by any of us!

-Messing up the process with the courier. Again, they didn’t intend for it to happen, but you would think they’d have a backup plan if  “the courier doesn’t realize FedEx is open 24 hours.” They should be embarrassed that even happened, regardless of whether it was the reason the failed test was thrown out.

-Having this stupid appeal process set up in this format in the first place. If you’re going to have a panel of three arbitrators, why would you have one from MLB and one from the players’ union? They’re just going to vote for their side regardless of any evidence; doesn’t that make them faulty in the first place? Have three independent arbitrators decide the case, not just one.

-Breaking confidentiality again tonight! MLB’s Rob Manfred, the arbitrator representing MLB in the case, popped off, saying he “vehemently” disagreed with the ruling and discussing details of the case. Again, this is all before we’ve heard anything from Braun? Manfred, why are you saying anything at all at this point? Again, THIS IS ALL SUPPOSED TO BE CONFIDENTIAL!

MLB made its own bed in this one, and they now have to sleep in it. I have a feeling this will get worse for them before it gets better. It’s been revealed that they were this careless in this instance, so how will players feel about testing in the future? About positive tests that have already come down? For that matter, how credible does the Mitchell Report look right now? Their entire testing process might come under fire. This is a nightmare for a league that claims to have cleaned up its sport.

It seems bonkers that we haven’t had anything other than a generic statement from Braun at this point. I suppose it’s possible that we don’t get anything more than that tomorrow, but I at least want to wait until possibly forming an opinion that he was let off on some sort of technicality.

Brewers win posting rights to Japanese center fielder

Posted by Steve

In what has become the off-season of the unexpected, the Brewers have apparently won the posting rights to Norichika Aoki, a center fielder for the Yakult Swallows, for $2.5 million.

I had actually heard a bit about him, but didn’t bother reading any scouting report until this news broke. He’s a center fielder, but it sounds like his arm is pretty weak, so he may be better suited in left. His slash line from 2007 to 2010 is .339/.421/.497/.918, although his numbers, along with the rest of the league, went down last year when they switched to a smaller baseball.

Fangraphs had an article on him a while ago in which he was called the best Japanese hitter since Ichiro. I’d be pretty happy if he was as good as Fukudome, who has a career .361 on-base percentage, but I’m guessing he doesn’t even have that much power. Still, if nothing else, he’s got to be better than Mark Kotsay.

Barring a trade, I’m guessing this means there goes any chance for Caleb Gindl or Logan Schafer this season. Still, this seems like a good move.

The Brewers will have 30 days to negotiate with Aoki. Since the posting fee wasn’t all that much, I’m guessing it won’t be more than 2 or 3 million dollars a year for a couple seasons.

So, it seems like the Brewers have a new 4th/5th outfielder? Probably good insurance if Braun is out.

Here’s some video of Aoki set to something that sounds like it’s straight out of Top Gun.

Better yet, here is the original report of the story, translated from Japanese:

Aoki, the Brewers win the Yakult

Yakult 18, posting system (bidding) parent declared outfielder Aoki Major League aims to transfer using (29) winning baseball team has announced the Brewers.

Yakult was $ 2.5 million bid from Nippon Professional Baseball through the Major Mechanism in 17 days (about 200 million yen) was notified and had to reply and accept the same day. Brewers got a 30-day exclusive negotiating rights.

Headquartered in Milwaukee Brewers are in the area belong to the National League. Played a division title this season.

Through team Aoki, “You have to bid on great teams, I am honored,” commented.

Amazing.

And finally, because I saw this tonight for the first time, here’s video of John Mayer calling a baseball game in Japan.

Ron and his bullpen

Posted by Steve

One thing Ron Roenicke has continued to do throughout the playoffs is manage his bullpen like it’s still the regular season. In the games that the Brewers’ starter has been knocked out early, he’s brought in people like Marco Estrada or Kameron Loe. Twice he’s done this with a day off the next day. In fact, the Brewers lost Game 5 without pitching any of their three best relievers.

This cannot happen. The only way I’d be okay with seeing Estrada pitch today is if the Brewers are winning by six runs or more.

If Marcum gets knocked out early tonight, and the Brewers find themselves down by three or four runs, it needs to be Hawkins/Saito/KROD coming in to keep the deficit where it is, not Estrada to let the Cardinals tack on to their lead.

There is some debate over whether the Brewers should be pitching Marcum tonight. Other options could be to pitch Yovani Gallardo on three days’ rest, or to start Chris Narveson.

I like the decision to stick with Marcum. He hasn’t been sharp lately, but I didn’t think he was horrendous his last time out. Plus, we know Marcum is a good pitcher–better than Narveson. He’s proven that over the course of the season and his career. I also don’t like bringing Yo back on three days’ rest. He’s never done it in his career, so doing it in the most important Brewer game in almost 30 years seems pretty crazy. Plus, then they’d be in a mess for Game 7.

I know I generally say you need to worry about winning the next game before managing for Game 7, but when the decision isn’t clear-cut (bringing back Yo on three days’ rest isn’t an obvious move), you might as well play to give yourself a better chance in Game 7.

I can’t say why, but I’m definitely expecting a win tonight. The crowd will be crazy, the team will be happy to be back home, and I expect them to score a lot of runs.

Most importantly, I’m just not ready for baseball season to be over yet. This team has been so fun to watch, and it wouldn’t be right for this to end before Game 7.

Revisiting the Sabathia contract

Posted by Steve

Since the only Brewers-based topic worth writing about now is the baffling fact that Casey McGehee still has a spot in the lineup, and since I just can’t bring myself to write about that anymore, I thought I’d change things up and go back three years to look at the contract CC Sabathia got from the Yankees. Seems timely with the Brewers facing him this afternoon.

After an otherwordly run leading the Brewers to the playoffs, the team tried everything they could to retain him. In the end, it was no contest, as the Yankees’ offer blew them out of the water by $60 million or so.

Basically, I wanted to take a look at whether Sabathia has been worth the money so far, and whether he’s likely to be worth his huge contract going forward.

In 2008, between Cleveland and Milwaukee, Sabathia put up a 7.6 WAR. His K/9 was 8.93, and his BB/9 was 2.1. He threw an incredible 253 innings.

Unsurprisingly, he hasn’t approached that performance in New York (it was such a good year that it was very unlikely to be duplicated). He’s still been very good, especially in 2009, but overall, he’s been a very good pitcher, not an elite one.

xFIP, K/9, BB/9

2008: 8.93 K/9, 2.1 BB/9

2009: 7.71 K/9, 2.62 BB/9

2010: 7.46 K/9, 2.80 BB/9

2011: 6.86 K/9, 2.21 BB/9

Basically, his peripheral stats have declined in each year since leaving the Brewers (except his walk rate has been very good this season). Normally, that would be an alarming trend and a warning sign that he’s in decline. Sabathia is a unique case, though, because of his incredible durability.

Those numbers alone aren’t great, but when they come over the amount of innings he provides, they end up being very valuable. Let’s take a look now at his innings total and how it affects his total value.

Innings total, WAR, Fangraphs Dollar Value (Ranks in baseball)

2008: 253 innings (1st), 7.6 WAR (1st), $34.4 million (1st)

2009: 230 innings (6th), 6.3 WAR (8th), $28.4 million (8th)

2010: 237.2 innings (3rd), 5.1 WAR (13th), $20.4 million (13th)

2011: 122 innings(7th), 3.4 WAR (6th)

Cumulative rankings from 2009-2011

Sabathia ranks 4th in innings pitched, 7th in WAR and has been worth $62.5 million, meaning he’s actually outperformed his contract to this point.

He’s really an incredible pitcher in the sense that he repeatedly logs huge inning totals and never gets injured.

Of course, we’re only halfway through year 3 in a 7-year contract. Here’s where I think the difference between the Yankees and Brewers comes into play.

It’s easy to sit here in hindsight and say the Brewers should have matched the Yankees’ offer, because Sabathia has outperformed his contract to this point. Even if he falls off a cliff, it’s very difficult to see him accumulating anything less than $100 million in value over the seven years unless he gets injured.

For the Yankees, paying $160 million for $100 million worth of production is no big deal. They have the assets to make that possible. For the Brewers, that would be a franchise killer. If they pay $160 million, they need very close to $160 million in production, because that amounts to a much higher percentage of payroll than New York. The Brewers simply couldn’t take the risk of 7/$160, while the Yankees could afford to.

Sabathia should have been expected to outperform his contract over three years. I don’t expect him to over seven years, however, and that’s just fine for the Yankees. It was a good move for both teams–a good signing by the Yankees given their situation, and a good non-signing by the Brewers given theirs. It will be interesting to see whether CC opts out of his contract after this season, which he has the right to do. He may think he can get a better deal than 4 years, $92 million he’ll have remaining on his contract. I think he probably could (most likely from the Yankees, a la A-Rod a few years back). Either way, it was a colossal move that the Brewers were right not to match.

Chris Narveswnage

Posted by Dan

I’m not entirely sure how long I can or should drag this out, but I would like to make a somewhat bold prediction: I think Chris Narveson is for reals.  Part of this is Brewers colored homer goggles and maybe I picked him up in my fantasy league, but hear me out.

First off, it’s important to note that Narveson wasn’t even as bad as his 4.99 ERA looked last year, as his 4.22 FIP indicates. He also logged 10 innings as a reliever and posted a 7.20 ERA. When you remove that, his season FIP is 4.15 as a starter.

Secondly, Narveson was great after the All-Star break. While I certainly didn’t notice it as I phoned it in on the Crew after that 9-ish game losing streak in May, it seems like maybe no one did. Narveson posted a 3.89 ERA and 1.17 WHIP along with a very solid K/9 of 7.33 and a 2.66 BB/9 rate. All told, a 3.44 FIP from August 1 on.  Including his 2 starts from this year lowers  those numbers to an even more impressive line I’m too lazy to calculate. And also encouraging, is that he’s carried success from last year into this year. There’s also nothing in his 2010 peripherals that screams, or even suggests “unsustainable.”

There’s some funky sample size stuff if you exclude 2010, as the most innings he’s thrown in an MLB season was 47 in 2009. So far, his Swinging Strike Percentage is up from 8.1% last year to 16% this year. He’s also made a few other possibly notable changes. He’s threw his fastball only 44% of the time last year and this year, down from 63% in 2009. He’s also throwing his changeup 8% more often this year than he did in 2010 (in place of his slider).  Trying to draw concrete conclusions from a sample 194 pitches, compared to 2900 last year is sort of foolish, but doesn’t seem totally insignificant.  Perhaps its a conscious decision to throw more change ups. I’d love to see if his pitch selection changed in the seasons second half, but can’t seem to find that data anywhere.

One last blurb from a CBS Sportsline article:

“If I told you Narveson is a former top prospect finally showing signs of reaching his potential, I’d technically be right. The problem is he was a top prospect way back in 2002. Kind of doesn’t apply anymore. 
But weren’t we saying the same thing about Colby Lewis this time a year ago? Baseball America ranked Narveson 86th among prospects in 2002 and Lewis 82nd that same year. Pretty close, right? 
That talent never goes away, not without physical change like an injury, so any player who winds up on that list at any point in his minor-league career is perpetually on the verge of breakout. For some players, it never happens, but for some, all it takes is a little tweak — like a mechanical change, an updated pitching arsenal or a surge of confidence — to put them over the top. 
Narveson deserved more hype than he got this spring for that reason alone. Yeah, maybe he hadn’t thrown 13 shutout innings yet, striking out 14 batters in the process, but when you consider he posted a 3.05 ERA and 1.11 WHIP with 45 strikeouts in 44 1/3 innings over his final seven starts last year, you get a clearer picture of what’s happening here. 
Forget Lewis. Narveson is the pitching equivalent of Jose Bautista . “

So there’s that. This could end up looking goofy in a few months, but I expect him to end the season with an FIP at or below 4.00 and hopefully his ERA will follow suit. He’ s always had good strikeout potential (career 7.94 K/9), and he’s showing real signs of growth. It wouldn’t be the weirdest thing in the world for a 29 year old, former top 100 prospect, left handed pitcher to suddenly figure it out, would it?