Category Archives: Uncategorized

What’s your Fuh-Fuh-Fantasy?!

Posted by Dan

Steve seems to have a pretty good read on the whole “Brewers” thing, so I’m going to deviate a bit from the strictly Brewers route this blog generally takes. Deal with it. I’m very excited for this season, with the Crew figuring to have a realistic shot to make the post-season, and my triumphant return to fantasy baseball. I didn’t get into a league in 2010 and definitely can’t wait to get back into it. Me and Stev-o have taken to creating a 12-team keeper league, with some minor league spots and an auction draft, which is a format I’ve never used before. I really enjoyed researching the auction format, and unless Steve censors my post, I’m going to run through the results for my team.

It’s a standard 9 hitters at the usual positions, 1400 innings pitched limit lineup. Scoring categories are the standard 5×5, except OBP instead of AVG, as well as BB/9 instead of WHIP. Also, Net Stolen Bases rather than Total stolen bases which is a subtle change.

Hanley Ramirez ($51) — I set out wanting to grab either Albert Pujols or Hanley Ramirez.  After another owner pushed me to $54 on Pujols, I decided to back down and go Plan B since I feel there are many good first basemen this year. Hanley is only 27, and should be a top SS for the next several seasons. Simple enough.

Mark Teixiera ($28) and Ryan Howard ($23) — I was determined to get 2 of the top 7-8 first basemen after Pujols (including Miguel Cabrera, Votto, Adrian Gonzalez, Fielder, Dunn, Teixiera, and Howard). The order they were nominated kind of dictated who I ended up with since I tended to be higher on the top 1B than most. Also, I was pretty prepared to be priced out on Votto and M-Cab after spending $51 on Hanley. There’s plenty of options at 1B later, but the top guys are pretty safe bets for 30 HR, 100 RBI. Both of these guys should be pretty safe, elite sluggers who I can park in my 1B and UTIL slot. I can’t say I wouldn’t have preferred to come away with Fielder and Dunn, but they both went for closer to $30. Howard concerns me as a “fall off the cliff” type candidate as he ages but I have to think he hits 30+ HR another year or two.

Cliff Lee ($24) — I hadn’t planned on a $20 pitcher, but I really liked Lee in this format. Last season, he pitched 212 innings, and posted a BB/9 of 0.76, which should go a long way to stabilizing that category (as well as the K, ERA and you’d think Wins). Even if he doesn’t replicate that, he should be super safe. On the downside, he is 32 which isn’t ideal for a keeper league, but whatevs.

Jose Bautista ($25) and Jayson Werth ($22) — A couple more old guys. I’m not expecting Jose Bautista to replicate his 50 HR, but I don’t really think I paid for 50  here. His power surge dates back to September of 2009, carried through a huge 2010, and he’s raking again this Spring. He had a 14.6% BB rate in 2010, so if pitchers try to work around him he wont start hacking away, and his .233 BABIP last year also isn’t great. Jayson Werth isn’t really a sexy pick, but he should be pretty safe in all 5 categories with little downside.

Mark Reynolds ($14) – I knew I was going to come away with this guy. Even with a BABIP 80 points below his career number dragging his BA down to .198 he still OBPed .320.  I’m going to be honest, I have no idea what number it takes to win or be average in a roto-league with OBP, but I have to think that with a little luck, Ill get like a .340 OBP out of him (at least) and 30+ HR which should be a huge profit.

Mike Napoli ($12) and Chris Iannetta ($3)– I really like this “Mike Napoli” clown too. He’s played his whole career in Anaheim, where Mike Scoscia (I’m not even going to see if that’s spelled correctly) hates him. Now, he’s playing in Texas and should rake. He hits a ton of HR, and he’s C-eligible despite supposedly playing some 1B and DH. I’ll root for a Michael Young trade to free up AB’s, but even 2009 he hit 20 HR while limited to 432 AB. Iannetta is a siminlar player, just not as good. Whatever, he has OPSed .965 and .837 at Coors the last 2 seasons. If I use him for 40 games at Coors, it’ll be a positive.

Colby Lewis ($10) and James Shields ($10) — I remember my first exposure to Colby Lewis. We were AT Miller Park watching an interleague game against the Rangers when I arrogantly claimed that Colby Lewis couldn’t be as good as his ERA suggested. Smartphone to the rescue! Except, this time my phone made me look stupid. Finished 2010 with 8.8 K/9 and 2.9 BB/9. He’ll be at risk of bad ERA luck playing in Texas but I’ll take my chances for 10 bucks.

James Shields  is the worlds unluckiest mofo. Here are some career stats: 1.22 HR/9 allowed and a .308 BABIP. Last year, same categories: 1.50 and .341. He also had a strand rate below his career average. He should bounce back from whatever garbage ERA he posted. I’m not even counting it since I didn’t play fantasy baseball.

Brian Roberts ($7) — I don’t particularly care for this old, decrepit fool. But I got driven up to $18 on Ben Zobrist, the guy I really wanted, so I had to settle here. Whatever, he was productive when healthy and I backed him up Danny Espinosa in the prospect draft, and later picked up Brad Emaus who projects to start for the Mets at 2B. I’m developing a mancrush on Emaus, and he posted these lines in the minors: last year in AA he posted(170 AB) .270/.402/.434 before moving to AAA: (364 AB) .299/.395/.495 and in 2008 he also posted .302/.380/.463 in high A. He was a rule 5 pick of the Mets this winter, so they’re gonna have to carry him around. I’m likewise stashing him in a minor league spot to see how he handles MLB pitching.

Andrew Bailey ($3), Drew Storen ($3), Matt Thornton ($4) and Joel Hanrahan ($3) — I generally avoid the top closers. They actually went for less in this draft then general, but I still abstained. Bailey is obviously hurt, and Storen has had a rough spring but I’ll take my chances. I really like Thornton out of this bunch, and if Bailey comes back healthy he should be good as well. I don’t trust Joel Hanrahan all that much, despite his obscene 100 K in 69 IP last year but I’m in it for the saves. Another likely plus from the Cliff Lee pick. But Thornton, Bailey and Storen should be decent pitchers regardless and I only paid $13 for this whole bunch. I also later claimed Ryan Madson after Lidge went to the DL. Madson is a great reliever, so I’m gambling the Phillies make him their closer as well. That should get me through Bailey’s injury. I also claimed David Hernandez, as a bet against JJ Putz’s health. Hernandez was dominant after struggling in the rotation, and moving to the pen (TAKE THAT, GRAMMAR!) with a 3.16 ERA and 11 K/9 as a reliever.

Chipper Jones ($1) — I’m not counting on more than like, 100 games out of him, but they should be 100 fun games. He’s a backup, so whatever.

Jose Tabata ($2), Andres Torres ($3), Seth Smith ($1) – These guys will all kind of fill that 3rd OF role. Tabata is my only  real “breakout” type candidate. Torres has no track record, but went for 16 HR and 26 SB last year. Seth Smith should start in Colorado, and has a career .970 OPS at Coors, with an .876 mark everywhere against RHP. He’ll be worth using when facing Jeff Suppan at Coors field. Although, really, so would pretty much anyone.

Josh Beckett ($2), Travis Wood ($1) and Edwin Jackson ($1) — Beckett was hurt last year, and Travis Wood has peripherals that suggest he’s a very good pitcher. Edwin Jackson is a perpetual tease, but he’s only 27. It wouldn’t be absurd if he learned how to pitch. Small sample size alert, but he pitched very well after the All Star break in Chicago. I’ll take a $1 flier on him. This is now 1300 words long, so for the sake of ending this– enough said on these three.

Brandon Belt ($1) — I’ve honestly never heard of this guy before the hype train got rolling this spring, but he dominated across 3 levels of the minors last year. The only concern, is that he’ll be lonely on my team of geriatric greats from 2007.

Summary – I crudely added up the ESPN projected totals of all the teams starting lineups, (only for HR and SB) and my team projects at the most HR, and to be 4th in steals so I should be pretty well-rounded on offense. My pitching should be solid enough, as long as Cliff Lee stays healthy. If I can get out to a quick start in Saves, and flip one of my closers to fill whatever emerges as a weakness my team should be in great shape — for this season at least.

BREWERS!

Posted by Dan

I am indeed alive. And even though Steve painted me as a fair weather fan, I want to tell you that I know some things. And I know some people who know some things.

My NL Central Preview:

The Brewers are good.

The Astros suck.

Tony La Russa WILL be a douchebag.

The Cardinals will re-sign Albert Pujols, but when it’s all said and done, you’ll think, “Wow, Albert Pujols, and to a bigger extent Tony La Russa, is a humongous douche. But the Cardinals have the biggest, and douchiest fans in the world.

I am alive.

2010 in review

Posted by Steve

Kind of a cool summary sent to me by WordPress. Gotta love the Gabe Kapler searches.

————

The stats helper monkeys at WordPress.com mulled over how this blog did in 2010, and here’s a high level summary of its overall blog health:

Healthy blog!

The Blog-Health-o-Meter™ reads Wow.

Crunchy numbers

Featured image

A helper monkey made this abstract painting, inspired by your stats.

A Boeing 747-400 passenger jet can hold 416 passengers. This blog was viewed about 9,700 times in 2010. That’s about 23 full 747s.

 

In 2010, there were 58 new posts, growing the total archive of this blog to 465 posts. There were 4 pictures uploaded, taking up a total of 4mb.

The busiest day of the year was January 5th with 240 views. The most popular post that day was Odds and ends.

Where did they come from?

The top referring sites in 2010 were brewcrewball.com, mail.yahoo.com, Google Reader, ballhype.com, and brewersfandemonium.yuku.com.

Some visitors came searching, mostly for gabe kapler, jj hardy, fire ken macha, nicole oswalt, and brad penny.

Attractions in 2010

These are the posts and pages that got the most views in 2010.

1

Odds and ends November 2009
5 comments

2

He’s not a winner. He really only had one good year. He doesn’t care that he misses time. He’s soft. He kidnapped my family. April 2008
2 comments

3

Corey Hart wears Jeff Francoeur sunglasses at night February 2010
4 comments

4

McGehee or Gamel? February 2010
5 comments

5

Evidence be damned! May 2010

End of an Era

Posted by Steve

Chalk this up as a win for baseball statheads, the English language, and reason: Joe Morgan is out as ESPN’s Sunday Night Baseball broadcaster after 21 freaking years.

To be honest, I’m struggling to make up my mind. In the grand scheme, it’s definitely a good thing for baseball. I’m sure there were many who believed Joe’s unprepared, under-researched, stubborn brand of broadcasting, so it can’t be a bad thing that he’s gone. No longer will ESPN’s top baseball analyst say things like, “I can’t comment on the Marlins, because I haven’t had the chance to see them this season,” or “The first thing I look at when voting for Cy Young is wins.”

At the same time, a part of me is sad. I loved tuning in to Sunday Night Baseball just to hear what whacky thing Joe would say next. I’ll miss Joe making an error and Jon awkwardly refusing to point it out, along with Joe’s stubborn silence after he’s been proven wrong. I’ll miss him boasting about his playing career. And I know I’ll never forget the inning and a half he spent dialoguing on what defines a small market team this past season.

Deadspin has some great comments on this, but my favorite: “Morgan didn’t see the ratings numbers, but it felt like enough people were watching the games.”

 

Runnin’ Ron Roenicke!

Posted by Steve

Or as I’ll probably end up calling him, Runnin’ (Into Outs) Ron Roenicke!

By all accounts, he sounds like a good character guy. He sounds like he’ll make more of an effort to build some sort of relationship with the players than Macha did, which can’t be a bad thing. And again, I won’t say anything definitive until he’s actually managed some games. Still, these are real, actual quotes that sure have me worried:

You guys are going to be asking “Why are you getting thrown out so much?”

“I guarantee we’re going to score more runs by being aggressive.” (And also make more outs.)

And finally…

“I wanted to be more aggressive [than Scioscia].”

Yikes.

Today’s number

Posted by Steve

Many may think today’s number is 600, but that actually is not the case. Today’s number is 2.

As in Mat Gamel has exactly two (2) plate appearances since being called up eight days ago.

Fire Ken Macha!

Posted by Dan

Just kidding, I don’t really think they should (or shouldn’t for that matter).  How’s that for taking a stance? But listening the radio today is my inspiration for this post.  Callers calling for Macha’s firing, radio hosts yelling, “IT WORKED FOR THE COLORADO ROCKIES LAST YEAR! IT WORKED FOR THEM!”

First of all, I’m going to be honest– I have too much schoolwork to do all the research necessary to satisfy my curiosity on the subject. So… I’m just going to speak in generalities that I will assume to be true. There’s really only two options when you fire your manager this early:

1. The team is as bad as they are playing, keeps playing badly, and no one cares/remembers

2. The team is not as bad as they’re playing, they turn it around, and the new manager is annointed a hero.

Those are the only two options I can possibly see here.  In the Brewers case, they are just not that good.  They’re like a .500 team so we can’t act like its a shocker that they get into a funk like this. Sooner or later, they’ll break out and win like 5 out of 6 and people take it too far the other way.  Firing Ken Macha won’t make Doug Davis not suck, it won’t fix Jeff Suppan, and it won’t stop OPSing .709 for Prince Fielder.  I don’t buy that Ken Macha’s “attitude” has anything to do with anything. Ned Yost was “too intense.” Ken Macha is “too relaxed.” Do people seriously believe this stuff?

I’d love to find some info as to like, winning percentage of teams before and after firing their manager midseason, but even that doesn’t tell the whole story because I suspect that teams who fire their manager early are underperforming and likely to improve anyway. While looking up a few things, I found this article from Baseball Prospectus (which I can only see part of as a non member):

My favorite quote:

“Choosing what amounts to a VP for a $200-million enterprise should be done with the utmost care. There should be interviews and second interviews and headhunters and background checks.  When you replace a manager in-season, you don’t get any of that. You get a process that consists of looking around the room and picking the least offensive of the seven guys hanging around, all of whom have been associated with the current failure.”

So, to summarize: Fire Ken Macha. Or don’t, it won’t really matter.

Hell’s Bells!

Posted by Dan

Does Steve ever post on this blog anymore? COME ON!

So everyone at work seems to wonder what I think of Trevor Hoffman, which made me think, “Hey, posting about Hoffman is more fun than school work! Hoffman it is!”

If you’ve tuned into a Brewer game lately you’ve probably seen him allow at least one home run. On the year, the numbers: 9 innings, 15 hits, 6 home runs, 3 BB, 5 K.  Good for an ERA of 13.00 and a WHIP 2.00.  Obviously everyone is quick to stick a fork in him and simply say that he’s done.  That could be the case, but I gotta think he finds a way to get guys out again.  His average fastball is right on track with last year (85.5 mph for both).  He’s clearly just leaving everything over the plate, and I think (hope?) he can find a way out of it.  I think he keeps the job for a couple of reasons, unless he continues to be so terrible that it forces Macha’s hand:

1) He’s clearly the Brewers best option for the role, and the Brewers bullpen isn’t exceptionally deep.  I think this is one of those situations where they have to try to get Hoffman right, rather than try to find his replacement.

2) Demoting a guy to the earlier innings (to me at least) always implies some sort of mental issue/roadblock and I can’t see this being the case with Hoffman. He’s been closing games since I was 8 years and I don’t think he suddenly lost the mental composition to do it.

3) He’s got only 6 saves to get to 600 for his career.  Someone on brewerfan pointed this out, and I tend to think it will at least play more of a factor than it should: Macha will be reluctant to remove him from the role.  If he removes him, and Hoffman doesn’t get to 600 for this reason, it reflects poorly on Macha.  I tend to agree that this actually will be a role in some way. Perhaps one of those unwritten baseball rules or something. Like pulling a guy in the 5th during a no hitter if he has 6 BB and 115 pitches? I don’t know. Granted, if Macha sticks with him and Hoffman continues to give away victories, Macha will be collecting unemployment in short order.

I realize my analysis isn’t earth shattering, by recommending to “stick with the hall of famer,” but there just aren’t great options. I’m not sure how good this team can be when the back end of the bullpen doesn’t include Hoffman.

One last unrelated note, I absolutely cannot wait to listen to Davey on the radio filling in for Uecker. That is all.

Follow-up

Posted by Steve

Just wanted to pass along this clip of ESPN’s Mike and Mike’s take on the Fielder thing.  It should be noted that Golic seems to be under the impression Zito is the one who allowed the home run last year when it was actually Merkin Valdez, but the point is still the same.  Pretty entertaining.  Generally the same thing I was saying.

2009 Zack Greinke vs. 2004 Ben Sheets

Posted by Steve

Sure, I’m about to beat a dead horse.  But it’s my blog (and Dan’s?), so I’m allowed.

I was very pleased to see the voters actually get one right and award Zack Greinke with the AL Cy Young yesterday.  Greinke was the best pitcher in baseball this season and definitely deserved the award.  Of course, the only reason there was any doubt was because of Greinke’s lack of wins–16.  That people still let an utterly meaningless “stat” such as win-loss record influence their evaluation is an embarrassment.  Fortunately, it did not affect the outcome in this case, but it still has in many cases.  None more glaring than… (Dah, dah dah daaaaah) The 2004 season of Ben Sheets! Cue the groaning, people heading for exits.

Let’s compare the two seasons.  You may be surprised by what we find (or if you know me at all, I guess you probably won’t)

Greinke 2009

229.1 Innings, 2.16 ERA, 242 strikeouts, 51 walks, 11 home runs

Sheets 2004

237.0 Innings, 2.70 ERA, 264 strikeouts, 32 walks, 25 home runs

Those are the only numbers I listed because other stats incorporate all these in some way.  ERA is extremely subjective and dependent on things like defense and scoring.  Strikeouts, walks, and home runs are the only things completely controlled by the pitcher (hence the title of Three True Outcomes).

To have the most value, you need to throw a lot of innings.  As you can see, both Greinke and Sheets were workhorses in these seasons.  The rest of the numbers are debatable as to who was more valuable.

The most glaring difference is home run totals.  As a fly ball pitcher, Sheets has always been plagued by the long ball.  25 is not a very good number.  On the other hand, 11 home runs in 229 innings by Greinke is insane.

Then you get to k/bb ratios, which is my favorite stat to look at for pitchers.  I consider a 3:1 strikeout-to-walk ratio to be very good, and it’s the marker I’m looking for if I for some reason needed to identify ace-caliber pitchers on a moment’s notice.  Greinke’s ratio of 4.75 is excellent.

Then we get to Sheets.  He had both a higher strikeout rate and a lower walk rate than Greinke’s 2009.  It’s good for an 8.25 k/bb mark, which is just otherworldly.  I went over the significance of that ratio in my Ode to Ben Sheets last year, so I won’t recite all that again except to say that it’s historic.  Incidentally, he put up a ratio of 10.55 in 2006, but that was over 106 innings.

So which was better?  For my personal affinity towards k/bb, I’d take Sheets’ season over Greinke’s.  It’s certainly debatable and there probably isn’t a wrong answer.  That’s not the point of this post.  All I’m trying to say is they are certainly comparable seasons in terms of value.

So what’s my point?  My point is that Greinke (rightfully) won the Cy Young in 2009.  Where did Sheets finish in 2004?  First?  Second?  Nope.  Would you believe a tie for eighth?  Because that’s what it was.

Is there any logical explanation for this?  Of course not; we’re discussing MLB Awards voters here.  The illogical, asinine, mind-numbingly stupid explanation is that Sheets’ record in 2004 was 12-14.  That he could have a losing record with that incredible stat line speaks volumes to how awful the rest of the team was, but that’s beside the point.

Roger Clemens won the Cy Young in 2004.  He had a very good season, but all the peripherals outside of home runs were vastly inferior to Sheets’.  The “edge” Clemens had over Sheets was his record; Clemens was 18-4 that year.  In truth, there was another candidate more deserving than Clemens aside from Sheets.  Randy Johnson had an insane year (290 strikeouts) but finished second in the voting due to a 16-14 record.

This still bothers me today, as if you couldn’t tell.  Sheets’ 2004 is better than most Cy Young seasons.  The majority of baseball fans have no idea Sheets ever had such a dominating season.  Many don’t realize he was a workhorse ace for many years.  In fact, many fans look at Sheets’ overall tenure with the Brewers in a negative light!  Sure he’s had more than his fair share of injuries, but those were all after 2005.  People don’t realize how good he was.  And it’s all because he was stuck on crappy teams and couldn’t get wins.

Every time I hear win totals used as the prominent qualification for the Hall of Fame, or hear Joe Morgan say the first thing he looks at in Cy Young voting is Win-Loss record, or hear a pitcher criticized for not getting more wins, a small part of me dies inside.  Performance should not be judged by a completely meaningless stat.  It will never happen, but I’d love to see the Win-Loss stat removed from the scorebook.

And take saves, batting average and RBIs with it.